Gallery – Otoplasty

Otoplasty patients

Patient 1. Otoplasty. The prominence of the upper part of both auricles was caused by insufficiently developed antihelical folds.

Patsient-1.-Otoplastika.-Enne-operatsiooni

Before procedures

Patsient-1.-Otoplastika.-Peale-operatsiooni

After procedures

Patient 2. Otoplasty. The surgical technique consisting of antihelical fold deepening combined with conchal setback was used.

Patsient-2.-Otoplastika-enne-operatsiooni

Before procedures

Patsient-2.-Otoplastika.-Peale-operatsiooni

After procedures

Patient 3. Revision otoplasty. The prominence of the upper part of both auricles was still evident after previous surgery. Failure of the previous operation was caused by insufficiently formed antihelical fold.

Patsient-3.-Korduv-otoplastika.-Enne-operatsiooni

Before procedures

Patsient-3.-Korduv-otoplastika.-Peale-operatsiooni

After procedures

Patient 4. Patient was bothered by too large and protruding eras. The surgery was aiming to reduce the size of the ears (reduction of 15 mm was achieved) and to correct their prominence.

Patsient-4.-Otoplastika-+-kõrvade-vähendamine.-Enne-operatsiooni

Before procedures

Patsient-4.-Otoplastika-+-kõrvade-vähendamine-peale

After procedures