Otoplasty patients
Patient 1. Otoplasty. The prominence of the upper part of both auricles was caused by insufficiently developed antihelical folds.
![]() Before procedures | ![]() After procedures |
Patient 2. Otoplasty. The surgical technique consisting of antihelical fold deepening combined with conchal setback was used.
![]() Before procedures | ![]() After procedures |
Patient 3. Revision otoplasty. The prominence of the upper part of both auricles was still evident after previous surgery. Failure of the previous operation was caused by insufficiently formed antihelical fold.
![]() Before procedures | ![]() After procedures |
Patient 4. Patient was bothered by too large and protruding eras. The surgery was aiming to reduce the size of the ears (reduction of 15 mm was achieved) and to correct their prominence.
![]() Before procedures | ![]() After procedures |